MOEEN KHAN
SOLICITOR ADVOCATE
Urdu
Hindi
Punjabi
- Member of The Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn
- Criminal Litigation Accreditation- The Law Society
- Higher Rights of Audience (Criminal Courts) Accreditation - Solicitor Regulatory Authority
- Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA)
- Member Defence Extradition Lawyers Forum (DELF)
- Solicitor Association of Higher Court Advocates (SAHCA)
- Bar at Law from The Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn, UK
- Higher Rights of Audience (Criminal Law) from BPP, London
- Criminal Litigation Accreditation from School of Law, Cardiff University
- Police Station Representative Accreditation from Swansea University
- Qualified Lawyers Transfer Test from Altior Kaplan, London
- LLB (PU)
Mr Khan is a Solicitor-Advocate (Higher Rights in Criminal Law) and a fully qualified Criminal Duty Solicitor, which means he is capable of representing his clients from Police Station to the Supreme Court of UK. Furthermore, Mr Khan has done his Bar at Law from Lincolns's Inn. In addition of being an experienced advocate, he is also very proficient with case preparation, case management and case analysis in complex legal matters.
Since joining Lloyds PR Solicitor’s Criminal Defence Team he regularly appears at Crown Courts, Magistrates Courts and Police Stations dealing with a wide range of criminal matters including all types of assaults (CA/ABH/GBH), domestic violence, harassment, multi jurisdiction complex fraud conspiracies, cybercrimes, money laundering, slavery, immigration frauds, serious sexual offences, murder, terrorism and illegal drugs related matters.
Mr Khan has experience in dealing with prosecutions under export control licensing regime for strategic goods such as military items and “dual use” items- being goods that, for example, along with civilian use, could also be used in production of weapons and/or Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) programmes. This licensing regime is part of an international framework and is based upon various international agreements, including “Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 referred to in the Export Control Order 2008 as the Dual Use Regulation. The UK regime is administered by the Department for International Trade (DIT) formerly, Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS).
Mr Khan has a particular interest in international dimension of criminal cases and advises individuals in respect of extradition requests. He has experience of dealing with complex restraint orders and confiscation orders.
His solution oriented strategic approach and quick thinking on his feet has been very valuable to his clients.
In the past Mr Khan has provided extensive legal assistance to various corporate entities, foreign governmental departments and international organizations. He also has experience in mediation, arbitration and immigration laws.
Mr Khan is a fully accredited Police Station Advisor and he likes to take control of his cases at initial police investigation stages. Protecting and advancing clients legal rights at this stage enable them to move in the right direction.
Mr Khan is a qualified Supervisor under Ministry of Justice, Criminal Legal Aid Contract regime.
Practice Areas
R v MM, Operation Fleet, Inner London Crown Court
The case concerned obtaining car insurances fraudulently on large scale by "Ghost Brokers". Case also involved complex confiscation issues.
R v DS, Operation Wisp, Old Bailey Crown Court
Represented defendant who was accused of organizing sham marriages on a large scale.
R v AM
Defendant was accused of immigration fraud (Sec 24), by using deception to remain in UK. Mr Khan conducted the trial, cross examined the UKBA officers. After the trial defendant was found not guilty and was acquitted.
Operation Salvage, Reading Crown Court
Represented defendant who was accused of involved in a conspiracy to make more that 500 fraudulent car accident and personal injury claims. Client was found not guilty after the trial.
R v SR
Represented defendant who is accused of conspiring to make fraudulent applications for British passports.
Operation Guard, St Alban Crown Court
Represented defendant who was accused of importation of drugs by hiding drugs in secret compartments of cars while they drove them to cross international borders.
R v SA, St Alban Crown Court
Representing defendant in a case where it is alleged that a property was sold fraudulently and proceeds from the sale were transferred to various bank accounts.
Operation Canova, Snaresbrook Crown Court
Case involving large scale immigration fraud by setting up companies to create false financial records for immigration purposes.
R v SL
Represented defendant who was accused of conspiring with other to defraud victims by pretending to be police officers.
R v SJ
Defendant was accused of importing 1,280 Kg of Gutka, which was seized by HMRC at Stansted Airport. Negotiation with HMRC were carried out on behalf of the defendant.
R v CG
Represented defendant who was accused of being part of organised international criminal network committing online shopping frauds.
R v GS
Represented defendant who was accused of section 2 of Terrorism Act 2006, for dissemination of terrorist publications.
R v IB
Represented client accused of breaches of export control licensing regime for strategic goods such as military items and “dual use” items- being goods that, for example, along with civilian use, could also be used in production of weapons and/or Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) programmes.
R v MK, Central Criminal Crown Court
Represented defendant who was accused of encouraging terrorism under section 1 of Terrorism Act 2006 by posting material on social media, YouTube and Microsoft Xbox accounts.
R v GS
Represented defendant who was accused of section 2 of Terrorism Act 2006, for dissemination of terrorist publications.
R v IB
Represented client accused of breaches of export control licensing regime for strategic goods such as military items and “dual use” items- being goods that, for example, along with civilian use, could also be used in production of weapons and/or Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) programmes.
R v MK, Central Criminal Crown Court
Represented defendant who was accused of encouraging terrorism under section 1 of Terrorism Act 2006 by posting material on social media, YouTube and Microsoft Xbox accounts.
R v GS
Represented defendant who was accused of section 2 of Terrorism Act 2006, for dissemination of terrorist publications.
R v IB
Represented client accused of breaches of export control licensing regime for strategic goods such as military items and “dual use” items- being goods that, for example, along with civilian use, could also be used in production of weapons and/or Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) programmes.
R v MK, Central Criminal Crown Court
Represented defendant who was accused of encouraging terrorism under section 1 of Terrorism Act 2006 by posting material on social media, YouTube and Microsoft Xbox accounts.
R v RA
Represented defendant who was accused of series of assaults on his partner.
R v KI
Represented defendant who was accused assaulting his girlfriend. He was acquitted at court.
R v RA
Represented defendant who was accused of making threats to kill his partner by putting knife to her throat.
R v MB
Represented defendant who was accused of punching his wife three times in the head while he was driving the car. The case was dropped by police after his interview at the police station.
R v TF
Represented defendant who was accused of slapping and kicking his partner. Prosecution eventually dropped the case.
R v IG
Represented defendant who was accused of causing serious injuries to his sister's husband. Defendant attended along with others when his sister asked for help in domestic altercation. The case was dropped at initial stage, client never got charged.
R v AE
Represented defendant who was accused of causing grievous bodily harm to his mother.
R v RA
Represented defendant who was accused of series of assaults on his partner.
R v KI
Represented defendant who was accused assaulting his girlfriend. He was acquitted at court.
R v RA
Represented defendant who was accused of making threats to kill his partner by putting knife to her throat.
R v MB
Represented defendant who was accused of punching his wife three times in the head while he was driving the car. The case was dropped by police after his interview at the police station.
R v TF
Represented defendant who was accused of slapping and kicking his partner. Prosecution eventually dropped the case.
R v IG
Represented defendant who was accused of causing serious injuries to his sister's husband. Defendant attended along with others when his sister asked for help in domestic altercation. The case was dropped at initial stage, client never got charged.
R v AE
Represented defendant who was accused of causing grievous bodily harm to his mother.
R v NK, Isleworth Crown Court
Defendant was accused of slavery by knowingly holding a person in servitude.
R v AOS
Represented a defendant who was accused of importation of cocaine. UKBA intercepted a parcel at Gatwick Airport and found drugs inside it. The drugs were replaced with dummy substance by police and delivered at defendant’s home address.
R v AJW and others
Represented a defendant who was accused of being a part of “Drug Syndicate” supplying cocaine in Aldershot region.
R v CMC
Defendant was interviewed at the police station for supply of drugs, namely cocaine and cannabis. Prosecution decided to take no further action after his interview at the police station.
R v VH
Represented defendant who was accused of selling drugs on streets with another.
R v HM
Represented defendant who was accused of selling drugs.
R v AOS
Represented a defendant who was accused of importation of cocaine. UKBA intercepted a parcel at Gatwick Airport and found drugs inside it. The drugs were replaced with dummy substance by police and delivered at defendant’s home address.
R v AJW and others
Represented a defendant who was accused of being a part of “Drug Syndicate” supplying cocaine in Aldershot region.
R v CMC
Defendant was interviewed at the police station for supply of drugs, namely cocaine and cannabis. Prosecution decided to take no further action after his interview at the police station.
R v VH
Represented defendant who was accused of selling drugs on streets with another.
R v HM
Represented defendant who was accused of selling drugs.
R v CA
Represented defendant who was accused of raping his wife.
R v IR
Defendant was accused of sexually assaulting a woman in Southwark.
R v DT
Defendant was accused of sexually assaulting another male in gym. Mr Khan represented him at the police station, the case was eventually no further actioned.
R v AF
Defendant was accused of possession of indecent photographs.
R v RN
Represented defendant who was accused of rape by his girlfriend. The case was dropped after initial investigation.
R v GU
Defendant was accused of rape at Travel Lodge.
R v JR
Represented defendant who was accused of raping another male.
R v JJ
Represented defendant who was accused of raping a female.
R v RK, Luton Magistrates Court
Client was appealing against Council’s decision to revoke his private hire licence.
R v NB, Hammersmith Magistrates Court
Defendant was accused of touting two undercover police officers for private hire.
R v BC, Watford Magistrate Court
An application was made by defence for removal of disqualification, which was granted by the court.
R v SH, Stratford Magistrates Court
Represented defendant who was accused of careless driving.
R v AY
Represented defendant who was accused of perverting course of justice by giving false details when he was requested to give driver’s details. The case was dropped at initial investigation, defendant was not charged.
R v RV, Westminster Magistrates Court
Representing defendant who is a Romanian national, who has been sentenced to 5 years 2 months imprisonment in Romania for Drug Trafficking and Fraud. Client is contenting extradition to Romanian a designated Category 1 territory for the purpose of Part 1 of Extradition Act 2003.
R v PK, Westminster Magistrates Court
Represented defendant wanted by Romanian authorities. Client contested extradition and he was allowed to live in UK.
R v BH, Westminster Magistrates Court
Represented defendant wanted by Romanian authorities. Client contested extradition and he was not extradited.
R v GC, Westminster Magistrates Court
Represented defendant wanted by Romanian authorities. Client contested extradition and he was not extradited.